ASSESSMENT OF PROTECTIVE STRUCTURES FOR ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE: CASE STUDY OF POMPEII, LEPENSKI VIR AND GOBEKLI TEPE

Nastasija Kocić ,
Nastasija Kocić
Sonja Krasić ,
Sonja Krasić
Jovana Tomić ,
Jovana Tomić
Isidora Mitrović
Isidora Mitrović

Published: 13.06.2024.

Biochemistry

Volume 39, Issue 1 (2024)

pp. 91-102;

https://doi.org/10.62683/zrgaf39.91-102

Abstract

The protection of archaeological sites is crucial for preserving their authenticity and historical significance. This study evaluates the effectiveness of protective structures implemented at three different sites: Villa dei Misteri in Pompeii, Lepenski Vir in Serbia, and GT1 Göbekli Tepe in Turkey. Our focus extends to iconic landmarks where different types of protective structures and different types of protection were used. Each structure is assessed based on criteria such as preservation of authenticity, physical protection, accessibility and presentation, sustainability, and aesthetic impact.The protective structures at all three sites demonstrate varying degrees of success in the selected criteria. Each structure has its advantages and disadvantages, highlighting the importance of careful design and maintenance to ensure the long-term sustainability of archaeological sites.This study seeks to improve our understanding of the key role played by geometric design, material selection and technological application in the preservation and presentation of cultural heritage on a global scale. By providing insight into successful strategies and potential challenges, the primary goal of this research is to extract valuable knowledge from global practice, for later use on concrete examples.

References

1.
Chidi O, Barnaby J, Kelechi A. Historical Heritage Preservation: The Role of Architectural Strategies. International Journal of Innovative Environmental Studies Research. 2023;(3):36–41.
2.
Emilija N. Evaluation of the protection and presentation of historic buildings in the Viminacium Archaeological Park in relation to their spatial context. 2018;
3.
Alessandra Z, Elisabetta R, Paolo B, Maffei R, Carra G. Innovative solutions for ultra-lightweight textile shelters covering archaeological sites. 2013;
4.
Elena VP. Momcilovic-Petronijevic Ana: Shelters for archaeological sites in Serbia: A research aiming to develop guidelines for future design and construction. Facta universitatis -series: Architecture and Civil Engineering. 2015;113–21.
5.
Işıl A, Ertosun. Evaluation of protective structures in archaeological sites for in situ conservation of achitectural remains and artifacts. 2012;
6.
De S, Caro. Excavation and conservation at Pompeii: a conflicted history. The Journal of Fasti Online: Archaeological Conservation Series.
7.
Marko N, Jelena Š. Cultural and natural heritage of Djerdap: Lost history or potential for sustainable development. 2022;24–37.
8.
Lee C, Moritz K, Devrim S. Uludag Celal: Göbekli Tepe: UNESCO Dünya Miras Alanı ve Değişen Yaklaşımlar. Mimarlik Dergisi. 2019;(405).
9.
Dragan K, Milan G. Šelteri-ocena stanja zaštitnih konstrukcija i njihovih efekata na pokrivene delove arheoloških lokaliteta. Zbornik radova Građevinsko-arhitektonskog fakulteta. 2016;58–68.
10.
Karakök Ç, Elif. Ertas Besir Sebnem: Usage Strategies to Increase the Socioeconomic Sustainability of Monumental Structures: The Example of the Hacı Ali Ağa Bath. Sustainability. 2023;
11.
Drdácký M, Herle I, Pospíšil S. 2011;
12.
Immacolata B, Anna M, Giuseppe M, Bruno C. Insitu experimental campaign on the covering structures of “Villa dei Misteri” in Pompeii. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring. 2018;
13.
Bruno C, Giuseppe M, Anna M, Elena C, Francesco I. 2014;
14.
Ninoslav C, Adrijana S, Despotović I. 2023;
15.
İrepoğlu Y. Şanlıurfa Göbeklitepe Arkeolojik Alanı Koruma Çatıları. Çelik İçin Korozyon ve Yüzey Koruma Uluslararası Sempozyumu, Çelik Yapılar. 2019;59.
16.
Özer K, Gözde. Arın Ensarioğlu Sebla: Design Proposal for a Protective Shelter to be Used in the Archaeological Excavation and Exhibition Phases of Housing Settlement and Mosaics of Myrleia. Journal of Mosaic Research. 2022;
17.
Kinzel M.

Citation

Copyright

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Most read articles